Coombs Test

Article Author:
Samuel Theis
Article Editor:
Muhammad Hashmi
Updated:
10/3/2019 11:25:04 PM
PubMed Link:
Coombs Test

Introduction

Antiglobulin testing, also known as the Coombs test, is an immunology laboratory procedure used to detect the presence of antibodies against circulating red blood cells (RBCs) in the body, which then induce hemolysis. The destruction of these red blood cells (RBCs) by antibodies directed against them is described diagnostically as autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Many etiologies fall under this classification.  

Antiglobulin testing can be either direct antiglobulin testing (DAT) or indirect antiglobulin testing (IAT). The principle of DAT is to detect for the presence of antibodies attached directly to the RBCs, which takes place by washing a collected blood sample in saline to isolate the patient’s RBCs; this procedure removes unbound antibodies that may otherwise confound the result. IAT, by contrast, is used to detect unbound antibodies to RBCs, which may be present in the patient’s serum. With direct antiglobulin testing, a monospecific or polyspecific reagent is then added to the washed RBCs to detect bound IgG and/or complement C3. In practice, many laboratories will first use the polyspecific reagent that can detect for both IgG and C3; a positive result will then be followed with monospecific testing to characterize the antibody further.[1] For indirect antiglobulin testing, serum from a blood sample gets isolated, and native RBCs removed. The isolated serum sample then gets incubated with foreign RBCs of known antigenicity. Antiglobulin reagent is then added, and the presence of agglutination indicates a positive result. 

Specimen Collection

The collection of a blood sample for antiglobulin testing requires a tube that is anticoagulated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); in standard practice, this collection tube traditionally has a lavender, red, or pink top. EDTA is used to chelate serum calcium to prevent in vitro fixation of complement factor C3 that would otherwise lead to a falsely negative result.[1]

Procedures

Various modifications have been reported for the improvement of the Coombs test, including the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and the antiglobulin gel test (AGT).[2][3] Some advantages in the AGT in comparison to the standard Coombs test include better reproducibility and easy testing. The AGT is the most sensitive test for the detection of anti-RBC antibodies in the serum. It is essential in pre-transfusion testing and the diagnosis of hemolytic disease of the newborn.[4] The AGT was released in Europe in 1988. It became available in the USA in 1995. Lapierre and collaborators developed this technology.

The AGT is routinely used to screen human sera for anti-human RBC antibodies. The procedure is as follows[5]

  • Use a gel microtube (it contains anti-IgG).
  • Add 25 microliters of serum in the microtube.
  • Add 50 microliters of low ionic strength solution (LISS)- suspended red blood cells at a 0.8% concentration to the reaction chamber of the microtube.
  • Incubate at 37 degrees Celcius for 15 minutes.
  • Spin for 10 minutes in a centrifuge at approximately 70 x g.
  • After centrifugation, positive reaction gets graded from 0 to 4+.
  • Negative reactions have RBC pellets on the bottom of the microtube with no agglutination.
  • One + reaction is indicated by erythrocyte agglutination at the lower half of the gel column.
  • Two + reaction has erythrocytes dispersed throughout the microtube.
  • Three + reaction contains erythrocytes displayed in the upper half of the gel column.
  • A four + reaction is indicated by a solid band of erythrocyte on the top of the microtube chamber

Indications

Coombs test is necessary when autoimmunity to red blood cells is a consideration in the differential diagnosis, including warm and cold hemolytic anemia.

Potential Diagnosis

The potential diagnosis of the Coombs test includes pre-transfusion testing, hemolytic transfusion reaction, and autoimmune or drug-induced hemolytic anemias.[6][7]

Normal and Critical Findings

Reporting of antiglobulin agglutination test results can be on a qualitative or quantitative basis. For qualitative methods, the interpreter examines the test tube and assigns a score based on a graded scale:

  • M: Mixed field – any degree of agglutination in a sea of non-agglutinated cells.
  • W: tiny aggregates, turbid reddish background.
  • 1: small aggregates, turbid reddish background.
  • 2: small to medium-sized aggregates, clear background.
  • 3: several large aggregates, clear background.
  • 4: aggregate or clump of cells.

In patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia, the degree of agglutination typically correlates with the severity of hemolysis. If no macroscopic agglutination appears, the sample will be examined microscopically to assure that there are no aggregates. A sample exposed to a reagent that demonstrates aggregates of at least 3 to 5 cells under microscopic examination is considered a positive result. Agglutination typically takes around 5 to 10 minutes to occur after the addition of the reagent. Direct antiglobulin testing may also be measured quantitatively using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), flow cytometry, or other immunoassay techniques.[8][9][10][11] Quantitative measurement of a sample may be necessary when isolation of a specific antibody is desired, such as in cases of autoimmune hemolysis due to antibodies other than IgG or C3. 

Interfering Factors

When performed correctly and utilized in the appropriate clinical context, direct antiglobulin testing has been shown to demonstrate a positive predictive value of 97 to 99 percent,[12] although a more recent study involving hospitalized patients reported a false positive rate of up to 7 to 8 percent in patients without any evidence of hemolysis clinically or histologically. The majority of these false positives show a low grade of agglutination, though up to 1 percent of these results may demonstrate higher grades of agglutination.[13] In another study consisting of a cohort of healthy, non-hospitalized individuals, the incidence of a positive DAT result without evidence of hemolysis was found to be 0.1 percent; approximately two-thirds of this cohort expressed IgG positivity.[14]

Several other confounding variables can affect the accuracy of DAT and IAT test results:

  • Type of antibody - most commercial antiglobulin testing screens for antibodies to IgG, complement C3, or both. As such, false-negative results may occur in cases of AIHA caused by autoantibodies other than IgG or C3, such as IgM or IgA.[15] In these uncommon cases, quantitative DAT may aid in detection.
  • Amount of antibody present - in some rare instances, autoimmune anemia may be induced by levels of antibody below the detection limit of DAT, which is approximately 150 to 500 molecules of IgG per red cell.[16][17] For example, the study conducted by Zupanska et al. was able to demonstrate in vitro phagocytosis of RBCs by monocytes at levels of 150 to 640 molecules of IgG3 and 1230 to 4240 molecules of IgG1 per red cell.[18][19] Thus, RBCs may undergo phagocytosis when opsonized by a level of antibody below the threshold of detection, resulting in a falsely negative result.[13]
  • High serum protein - certain diseases, such as myeloproliferative diseases, may cause a falsely positive agglutination study due to abnormally high levels of protein unrelated to antibody-RBC agglutination. Exogenous sources of excess protein or immunoglobulin, such as cases in which a patient is receiving intravenous immune globulin (IVIG), may also result in a falsely positive study.
  • Infection - the serum of individuals infected with certain microorganisms may create a false positive agglutination result. Examples include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), malaria, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and in rare cases, the hepatitis E virus (HEV).[20]
  • Antiphospholipid syndrome - cross-reactivity between antiphospholipid antibodies and RBC membranes can result in falsely positive DAT testing, as reported by Win et al.[21]
  • Wharton Jelly - in neonatal umbilical cord blood samples, the presence of mucopolysaccharide-rich Wharton’s Jelly has been shown to produce false-positive antiglobulin results.

Patient Safety and Education

The patient should be made aware that Coombs testing is a relatively safe procedure. The risks associated with testing are the same as that of standard blood sample collection. Patients do not need to fast before testing. 

Clinical Significance

Antiglobulin testing, particularly qualitative direct antiglobulin testing, is clinically useful in cases where there is clinical suspicion of autoantibody-induced RBC hemolysis. DAT testing typically involves the use of a polyspecific reagent consisting of IgG and complement C3. Indirect antiglobulin testing is clinically useful for the detection of circulating antibodies that have the potential to induce RBC hemolysis; this test is most commonly utilized for RBC phenotyping and in crossmatch screening for blood transfusion. A positive antiglobulin result requires analysis in the clinical context to make an accurate diagnosis. Healthcare costs and the burden of laboratory time can be minimized by first screening with a polyspecific reagent before confirming the antibody with monospecific or quantitative analysis. Rarely, autoimmune hemolysis may be suspected even in the absence of positive DAT testing; in this instance, quantitative DAT testing may help to identify less common antibody subtypes other than IgG or C3. In the absence of other confounding variables (see “Interfering Factors” above), positive antiglobulin testing indicates the presence of hemolysis by antibodies directed against native RBCs. There are several major areas of clinical significance:

  • Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA): AIHA is traditionally the most recognized cause of positive antiglobulin testing, and has been the topic of extensive study. The classification “AIHA” serves as an overarching descriptor that unifies a large group of diagnoses with differing etiologies that cause hemolysis by means of antibodies against RBCs.[22] The classification can be dichotomized further by considering factors such as warm versus cold agglutination, and primary versus secondary cause. AIHA may also be drug-induced or syndromic (see “Evans syndrome”). Further characterization of diseases that fall under this classification is beyond the scope of this entry.
  • Alloimmune-mediated hemolytic transfusion reaction (AHTR): AHTR occurs when a post-transfusion specimen develops a newly found alloantibody. The formation of an alloantibody can occur as quickly as within 2 to 3 days.[23] The development of alloantibodies results in a positive DAT test but may or may not be associated with hemolysis.[1]

  • ABO blood group typing: in blood transfusions and hematopoietic stem cell transplants, indirect antiglobulin testing can be used to identify the RBC phenotype to minimize the chances of donor incompatibility. 

  • Hemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn (HDFN): HDFN occurs when maternal IgG forms against fetal antigens, notably the Rh or Kell antigen. The most common type of HDFN is due to ABO incompatibility, which occurs in approximately 15 to 25% of pregnancies and tends to be less severe.[24] The incidence of positive DAT testing in ABO HDFN is very low at around 1 percent, and of that group, only approximately 23% of newborns will develop clinically significant jaundice; hence, DAT is a poor positive predictor of newborns that will require treatment.[1][24][25]


References

[1] Parker V,Tormey CA, The Direct Antiglobulin Test: Indications, Interpretation, and Pitfalls. Archives of pathology     [PubMed PMID: 28134589]
[2] Wenz B,Apuzzo J, Polyethylene glycol improves the indirect antiglobulin test. Transfusion. 1989 Mar-Apr     [PubMed PMID: 2922789]
[3] Reisner R,Butler G,Bundy K,Moore SB, Comparison of the polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test and the use of enzymes in antibody detection and identification. Transfusion. 1996 Jun     [PubMed PMID: 8669077]
[4] Lapierre Y,Rigal D,Adam J,Josef D,Meyer F,Greber S,Drot C, The gel test: a new way to detect red cell antigen-antibody reactions. Transfusion. 1990 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 2305438]
[5] Rumsey DH,Ciesielski DJ, New protocols in serologic testing: a review of techniques to meet today's challenges. Immunohematology. 2000     [PubMed PMID: 15373603]
[6] Azarkeivan A,Ansari S,Ahmadi MH,Hajibeigy B,Maghsudlu M,Nasizadeh S,Shaigan M,Toolabi A,Salahmand M, Blood transfusion and alloimmunization in patients with thalassemia: multicenter study. Pediatric hematology and oncology. 2011 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 21854216]
[7]     [PubMed PMID: 8241613]
[8] Podberezin M,Levina A,Romanova L,Margolin O,Nasibov O,Pivnik AV, Quantitation of red cell-bound immunoglobulins and complement in lymphoma patients. Immunohematology. 2000;     [PubMed PMID: 15373606]
[9] Bencomo AA,Diaz M,Alfonso Y,Valdés O,Alfonso ME, Quantitation of red cell-bound IgG, IgA, and IgM in patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia and blood donors by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immunohematology. 2003;     [PubMed PMID: 15373694]
[10] Nathalang O,Chuansumrit A,Prayoonwiwat W,Siripoonya P,Sriphaisal T, Comparison between the conventional tube technique and the gel technique in direct antiglobulin tests. Vox sanguinis. 1997;     [PubMed PMID: 9145487]
[11] Lin JS,Hao TC,Lyou JY,Chen YJ,Liu HM,Tzeng CH,Chiou TJ, Clinical application of a flow cytometric direct antiglobulin test. Transfusion. 2009 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 19320864]
[12] Chaplin H Jr, Clinical usefulness of specific antiglobulin reagents in autoimmune hemolytic anemias. Progress in hematology. 1973;     [PubMed PMID: 4545113]
[13] Meulenbroek EM,Wouters D,Zeerleder SS, Lyse or not to lyse: Clinical significance of red blood cell autoantibodies. Blood reviews. 2015 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 26006097]
[14] Hannon JL, Management of blood donors and blood donations from individuals found to have a positive direct antiglobulin test. Transfusion medicine reviews. 2012 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 22000666]
[15] Boven LA,de Haar-Holleman A,Folman CC,Kraaijenhagen RJ,Fijnheer R, Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of severe Rh e-specific IgA-mediated autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Annals of hematology. 2012 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 21805111]
[16] Garratty G, Immune hemolytic anemia associated with negative routine serology. Seminars in hematology. 2005 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 16041665]
[17] Segel GB,Lichtman MA, Direct antiglobulin (     [PubMed PMID: 24411920]
[18] Zupańska B,Brojer E,Thomson EE,Merry AH,Seyfried H, Monocyte-erythrocyte interaction in autoimmune haemolytic anaemia in relation to the number of erythrocyte-bound IgG molecules and subclass specificity of autoantibodies. Vox sanguinis. 1987;     [PubMed PMID: 3604180]
[19] Zupańska B,Thompson E,Brojer E,Merry AH, Phagocytosis of erythrocytes sensitized with known amounts of IgG1 and IgG3 anti-Rh antibodies. Vox sanguinis. 1987;     [PubMed PMID: 3120411]
[20] Leaf RK,O'Brien KL,Leaf DE,Drews RE, Autoimmune hemolytic anemia in a young man with acute hepatitis E infection. American journal of hematology. 2017 May;     [PubMed PMID: 28230259]
[21] Win N,Islam SI,Peterkin MA,Walker ID, Positive direct antiglobulin test due to antiphospholipid antibodies in normal healthy blood donors. Vox sanguinis. 1997;     [PubMed PMID: 9145490]
[22] Gehrs BC,Friedberg RC, Autoimmune hemolytic anemia. American journal of hematology. 2002 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 11921020]
[23] Dolatkhah R,Esfahani A,Torabi SE,Kermani IA,Sanaat Z,Ziaei JE,Nikanfar A,Chavoshi SH,Ghoreishi Z,Kermani AA, Delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction with multiple alloantibody (Anti S, N, K) and a monospecific autoanti-JK(b) in intermediate β-thalassemia patient in Tabriz. Asian journal of transfusion science. 2013 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 24014947]
[24] Keir A,Agpalo M,Lieberman L,Callum J, How to use: the direct antiglobulin test in newborns. Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition. 2015 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 25395493]
[25] Dinesh D, Review of positive direct antiglobulin tests found on cord blood sampling. Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2005 Sep-Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 16150068]