The Bennett fracture is the most common fracture involving the base of the thumb. This fracture refers to an intraarticular fracture that separates the palmar ulnar aspect of the first metacarpal base from the remaining first metacarpal. The injury is typically caused by axial loading on a partially flexed metacarpal and may be associated with other carpal bone fractures or ligament injuries. Radiographs are essential in the evaluation of these injuries and in helping to plan a surgical approach for reduction, as these fractures are considered unstable. The surgical treatment is varied for these fractures which may consist of closed reduction with percutaneous pinning or open reduction with either pins or inter-fragment pinning. If there is a good alignment of the fracture fragments at post-surgical fixation, clinical outcomes are generally good.
This fracture is due to an axial load that occurs on a partially flexed metacarpal and may be associated with fractures involving the adjacent carpal bone (trapezium) and/or associated ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint.
The Bennet fracture is a subtype of fractures involving the thumb/first ray. Total fractures that involve the thumb have been found to occur most commonly in children and the elderly. In children (between ages of infant to 16 years), 22% of all tubular bone fractures involved the first ray; whereas in patients older than 65 years, 20% of hand fractures occurred in the thumb. In the elderly population, the thumb was the most common tubular bone fractured with the fracture pattern tending to be oblique and intra-articular.
The fracture pattern is distinct. The base of the first metacarpal is fractured with intra-articular extension due to the palmar ulnar fragment of the first metacarpal held in place by its ligamentous attachment to the trapezium (known as the anterior oblique ligament) during the axial loading with the rest of the metacarpal moving in the opposite direction and the main fracture line occurring along this point of weakness. Due to this fracture, the first metacarpal shaft subluxes dorsally, proximally, and radially due to the pull of the abductor pollicis longus, extensor pollicis longus, extensor pollicis brevis, and the adductor pollicus brevis, which remain attached to the fracture fragment.
Pain and swelling localized to the base of the thumb.
Standard hand radiographs include anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and oblique views. Additional dedicated views of the thumb can be obtained to provide additional information about the injury, including a Roberts view. This view is a true AP view of the first carpal-metacarpal joint; it is performed with hyperpronation of the forearm having the dorsal aspect of the thumb placed against the radiographic plate and the x-ray beam directed 90 degrees to the plate. Another view is the Betts view, which is obtained with the palm overpronated 20 degrees from flat against the radiograph plate and the beam directed 15 degrees proximal to distal. Stress radiographs can also be performed by pressing the radial aspect of the thumbs together on an AP view, which may demonstrate subluxation of the metacarpal base radially relative to the trapezium on the symptomatic side.
Based upon the radiographic appearance, Gredda classified Bennett fractures into three types, with type 1 being a fracture with a single ulnar fragment and subluxation of the metacarpal base, type 2 an impaction fracture without subluxation of the first metacarpal, and type 3 an injury with a small ulnar avulsion fragment in association with metacarpal dislocation.
Proper reduction requires traction in an axial direction with palmar abduction, and pronation while applying external pressure over the first metacarpal base. Thumb extension (known as the hitchhiker position) has been shown to cause fracture displacement and should be avoided.
In the initial article by Bennett, he described the treatment of these fractures with closed reduction and splinting which remained the preferred method of treatment until the 1970s. Historical reports have shown good outcomes with this treatment, although more recent studies have shown poor outcomes when treating these fractures with casting alone. Surgical treatment of Bennett fractures is varied but generally consists of either closed reduction with percutaneous pinning or open reduction with either pins or interfragmentary screws. All methods of fixation have been shown to be effective in case reviews and series. Treating with closed reduction with intermetacarpal fixation from the first to the second metacarpal and/or to the trapezium is usually effective in reducing the first metacarpal shaft subluxation. If it is decided to treat this fracture with open reduction, it is most commonly performed through a Wagner incision. The decision to treat these fractures with either open reduction or closed reduction is still a matter of debate.
There is a debate in the literature regarding the amount of articular step-off at the fracture site that is acceptable in the nonathlete populations. Some authors have found no correlation between the quality of articular reduction and radiographic or subjective outcomes, while biomechanical studies have demonstrated that 2 mm of persistent articular surface step-off does not alter the contact pressures at the location of the step off. It is therefore concluded that bony apposition of the fragments within 2 mm and the correction of any joint subluxation will be tolerated without increasing the risk of posttraumatic arthritis. Despite is biomechanical evidence suggesting good outcomes, many clinical studies have suggested that anatomic reduction is preferred.
Rolando fracture which is a comminuted fracture at the base of the first metacarpal with a maintained volar carpal ligament, preventing displacement of the volar fragment.
The range of motion exercises may begin 5 to 10 days post screw fixation and after four weeks after pinning (after the pins are removed). Long-term outcomes based on the study of Kjaer-Petersen which reviewed 41 Bennett fractures note that based on the quality of the fracture reduction. Eight-six percent of patients with an anatomic reduction (less than 1 mm step off) had no residual symptoms, where only 46% of patients with good or poor reduction (greater than 1 mm step off) remained asymptomatic.
Definitive treatment algorithms are lacking due to the small number of patients that are encountered with this fracture, lack of long-term imaging follow up, and lack of randomized prospective data.