Adenosine SPECT Thallium Imaging


Introduction

Adenosine single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) thallium (Tl-201) imaging is a non-invasive myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) test.[1]

The underlying principle of the test is that when the myocardium is under stress, the diseased ventricle receives less blood flow than the normal heart muscle. SPECT scan performed after the stress event will reveal the distribution of thallium and therefore the relative blood flow to the different parts of the ventricle. Images are also obtained at rest and compared. The thallium is injected and taken up by the myocardial cells so that the initial distribution of the tracer reflects viable myocardium. Images are then taken during stress (induced by adenosine) and at rest reflect myocardial perfusion and viability.

Currently, SPECT Tl-201 is used mainly for myocardial viability assessment when positron emission tomography (PET) or magnetic resonance imaging viability assessment is not feasible. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC) recommend against using adenosine SPECT Tl-201/technetium 99m, dual-isotope (rest-stress), imaging for detecting myocardial ischemia because this protocol has high radiation exposure (up to 23 mSv) compared to other isotopes.[2] Tl-201 is a potassium analog, a radioactive isotope of thallium with a half-life of 73 hours, which is up-taken by myocardial cells and detects an area with hypo-perfusion and myocardial infarction as a cold spot. It has many other medical applications such as renal medullary imaging and tumor detection.[3] In clinical practice, technetium 99m agents (Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin) are more commonly used with SPECT imaging to detect myocardial ischemia because of low radiation exposure (4.2–6.3 mSv) compared to Tl-201.[2]

Adenosine is a nucleoside that is composed of adenine and d-ribose, a potent coronary vasodilator through activation of A2A receptors in smooth muscles and endothelium.[4] It is used as a continuous infusion in pharmacological SPECT stress test for patients who can not exercise to increase coronary blood flow and radioisotopes uptake by myocardial cells with normal coronary perfusion. Adenosine has several side effects that correlate with the activation of other receptors such as A1AR, A2B, and A3AR. These sides effects are hypotension, tachycardia, atrioventricular block, bronchospasm, peripheral vasodilatation, and gastrointestinal symptoms.[5] Other vasodilator agents that are also usable for pharmacological SPECT stress test are dipyridamole and regadenoson. Regadenoson is an adenosine derivative and selective A2A receptor agonist. Compared to adenosine, regadenoson dosing is as one injection because of long half-life, and it has a more favorable side effect profile because of its selectivity to the A2A receptor.[6] Therefore, regadenoson is the most common pharmacologic vasodilator that is currently used in pharmacological SPECT stress test (83%).[7]

Indications

Indications for pharmacological SPECT stress test include patients who are unable to exercise or have disabling comorbidity for the following purposes[8]:

  1. To diagnose obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (Class I)
  2. For risk assessment in patients who are known to have stable IHD, especially with LBBB (Class I)
  3. To evaluate coronary stenosis with uncertain physiological significance before revascularization (Class I)
  4. To evaluate new or worsening symptoms not consistent with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients who have stable IHD (Class I)
  5. For follow-up assessment at 2-year or longer intervals in patients who have stable IHD with previous evidence of silent ischemia or with elevated risk for a recurrent cardiac event, who have a history of incomplete coronary revascularization with an uninterpretable EKG (Class IIa)

Pharmacological SPECT stress test is appropriate for patients who are unable to exercise or have disabling comorbidity for the following purposes[9]:

  1. For new-onset or newly diagnosed heart failure with LV systolic dysfunction
  2. For ventricular tachycardia regardless of the risk for CAD
  3. For syncope in patients with intermediate or high risk for CAD
  4. For elevated troponin in patients without additional evidence of ACS
  5. For patients with possible ACS with no evidence of ischemia in EKG and negative or minimally elevated troponin
  6. For patients with intermediate or high-risk Duke treadmill score
  7. For follow-up assessment at five years after CABG
  8. For asymptomatic patients with high IHD risk (ATP III risk criteria)
  9. If prior noninvasive evaluation equivocal, borderline, or discordant stress testing
  10. For coronary calcium Agatston score greater than 400 or greater than 100 with high risk for IHD
  11. Pre-operative risk assessment in intermediate-risk surgery or vascular surgery for patients with one or greater clinical risk factor and poor functional capacity (< 4 METs)
  12. Viability test for patients with severe LV systolic dysfunction before revascularization
  13. To evaluate for inducible ischemia within three months of an acute coronary syndrome in patients who are hemodynamically stable without recurrent symptoms or signs of heart failure

Contraindications

Absolute Contraindications

The pharmacological vasodilators are contraindicated in the following cases[2]:

  1. Obstructive lung disease with ongoing wheezing or a history of reactive airway disease
  2. Second- or third-degree AV block without a pacemaker
  3. Sinus node disease without a pacemaker
  4. Systolic BP < 90 mmHg, especially in the following scenarios:
    1. Autonomic dysfunction
    2. Hypovolemia
    3. Left main coronary artery stenosis
    4. Stenotic valvular heart disease
    5. Pericarditis or pericardial effusions
    6. Stenotic carotid artery disease with cerebrovascular insufficiency
  5. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP greater than 200 mmHg or diastolic BP greater than 110 mmHg)
  6. Recent (less than48 hours) use of dipyridamole or acetylsalicylic acid/dipyridamole
  7. Known hypersensitivity to pharmacological vasodilators
  8. Acute coronary syndromes
  9. Recent (2 to 4 days) after acute myocardial infarction

Relative Contraindications

  1. Sinus bradycardia with heart rates less than 40 beats per minute
  2. Mobitz Type 1 second-degree AV block
  3. Ingestion of caffeinated foods/beverages within the last 12 hours
  4. Severe aortic stenosis
  5. Seizure disorder

Personnel

The study should take place under the supervision of a board-certified nuclear cardiologist or nuclear radiologist. 

Preparation

Patients should avoid oral intake for three hours prior to the test except for medications with sips of water. Patients should avoid any medications that contain methylxanthines or caffeine and, food/beverages with caffeine for 12 hours because these products interfere with the action of pharmacological vasodilators and lead to poor image quality.[10] Dipyridamole should also be avoided for 48 hours prior to the test because it can lead to severe hypotension. Patients should avoid wearing any metals or other potential attenuators (e.g., bras with under-wire) because these objects may lead to attenuation artifacts and poor image quality.

Technique or Treatment

There are many protocols for pharmacological SPECT study. The following protocols are the two most common protocols that are used in the clinical practice[2]:

1. Tl-201 Stress/Redistribution Rest

This test is a perfusion test and a viability test. The following are the steps of this protocol:

  1. A patient is injected with pharmacological vasodilator (adenosine (140 mcg/kg/min continuous infusion for six minutes) or regadenoson (one dose of 0.4 mg injection)) and a Tl-201 radio-tracer
  2. Stress cardiac images are then taken after 15 minutes with gamma cameras
  3. Rest cardiac images are then taken after 2.5 to 4 hours with gamma cameras. (This step is optional based on the stress cardiac images)
  4. Redistribution cardiac images are then taken after 24 hours from the initial injection with gamma cameras. (This step is optional based on the stress and resting cardiac images)

2. Tl-201 Rest/Redistribution

This protocol used for a viability test only. The following are the steps of this protocol:

  1. A patient is injected with a Tl-201 radio-tracer at rest
  2. Rest cardiac images are then taken after 15 minutes with gamma cameras
  3. Redistribution cardiac images are then taken after 3 to 4 hours or 24 hours from the initial injection with gamma cameras. (This step is optional based on the stress and rest cardiac images)

Complications

Most of the side effects of this test are related to pharmacological vasodilators and are usually self-limited. However, these drugs have correlations with a severe side effect such as myocardial infarction.[11][12] The common side effects of these drugs are flushing, headache, chest discomfort, dyspnea, gastrointestinal discomfort, lightheadedness/dizziness, AV block, paresthesia, hypotension, nervousness, and arrhythmias. Aminophylline (50 to 250 mg) or caffeine should be used to reverse the effects of pharmacological vasodilator if a patient develops severe side effects such as hypotension with SBP less than 80 mmHg, 2nd or 3rd degree AV block, arrhythmia, wheezing, severe chest pain with ST-segment depression, or signs of poor perfusion.[2]

All patients should be informed that myocardial perfusion imaging also increases exposure to significant radiation (more than a CT scan). 

There is also a small risk of an allergic reaction to the radiocontrast.

All patients stressed with adenosine must abstain from caffeinated foods, cola beverages, and medications for at least 12 hours before the procedure. In addition, both theophylline and aminophylline mist be discontinued 24 hours prior to the test.

Clinical Significance

SPECT stress test has been shown to have excellent diagnostic and prognostic values for IHD. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SPECT stress test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease are 82%, 76%, and 83%, respectively.[13] The risk of cardiac events (cardiac death or myocardial infarction) in patients with normal SPECT scan is less than 1% per year. The rate of cardiac events increases significantly with worsening in cardiac images scan findings.[14][15]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Healthcare workers in clinical practice should be familiar with the SPECT thallium imaging study. It is a tool to assess myocardial viability when other tests are not available. A nuclear-cardiologist usually performs the test with a team of nurses and radiology technicians. One nurse is dedicated to the monitoring of the patient during the test and is responsible for ensuring that resuscitative equipment is present in the suite before the test is started. A pharmacist specializing in nuclear medicine should assist with proper dosing. At all times during the test, vital signs and oxygenation must be recorded every few minutes. If abnormalities are detected, the team should be apprised of the abnormality immediately. A team approach is vital to prevent complications from the SPECT thallium test.

The SPECT stress test has been shown to have excellent diagnostic and prognostic values for IHD. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SPECT stress test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease are 82%, 76%, and 83%, respectively.[13]

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

The nurse should ensure that the patient has not ingested any caffeinated beverages or colas for at least 12 hours prior to the procedure. In addition, the nurse must ensure that the patient did not take theophylline for 24 hours prior to the test. The labs should be checked for renal function and any allergy to the contrast dye should be documented.

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring

Prior to injecting adenosine, the patient must be on a cardiac monitor and have an intravenous line. The vitals should be measured at baseline and every 2 minutes thereafter. A dedicated nurse must monitor the patient during the procedure. After the procedure, the patient's vitals are assessed for the next 45-90 minutes.


Details

Editor:

Roman Zeltser

Updated:

9/12/2022 9:13:04 PM

References


[1]

Iskandrian AS. Single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium imaging with adenosine, dipyridamole, and exercise. American heart journal. 1991 Jul:122(1 Pt 1):279-84; discussion 302-6     [PubMed PMID: 2063758]


[2]

Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL, Einstein AJ, Travin MI, Verberne HJ. ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. 2016 Jun:23(3):606-39. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0387-x. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26914678]


[3]

Lebowitz E, Greene MW, Fairchild R, Bradley-Moore PR, Atkins HL, Ansari AN, Richards P, Belgrave E. Thallium-201 for medical use. I. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 1975 Feb:16(2):151-5     [PubMed PMID: 1110421]


[4]

Borea PA, Gessi S, Merighi S, Vincenzi F, Varani K. Pharmacology of Adenosine Receptors: The State of the Art. Physiological reviews. 2018 Jul 1:98(3):1591-1625. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00049.2017. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29848236]


[5]

Verani MS. Pharmacological stress with adenosine for myocardial perfusion imaging. Seminars in nuclear medicine. 1991 Jul:21(3):266-72     [PubMed PMID: 1948115]


[6]

Garnock-Jones KP, Curran MP. Regadenoson. American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions. 2010:10(1):65-71. doi: 10.2165/10489040-000000000-00000. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20063904]


[7]

. 2013 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology / MedAxiom Nuclear Survey. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. 2014 Apr:21 Suppl 1():5-88. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9862-z. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24619286]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, Douglas PS, Foody JM, Gerber TC, Hinderliter AL, King SB 3rd, Kligfield PD, Krumholz HM, Kwong RY, Lim MJ, Linderbaum JA, Mack MJ, Munger MA, Prager RL, Sabik JF, Shaw LJ, Sikkema JD, Smith CR Jr, Smith SC Jr, Spertus JA, Williams SV, American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012 Dec 18:60(24):e44-e164. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.013. Epub 2012 Nov 19     [PubMed PMID: 23182125]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[9]

Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, Heidenreich PA, Henkin RE, Pellikka PA, Pohost GM, Williams KA, American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, American College of Radiology, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Society of Nuclear Medicine. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009 Jun 9:53(23):2201-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.013. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19497454]


[10]

Tejani FH, Thompson RC, Kristy R, Bukofzer S. Effect of caffeine on SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during regadenoson pharmacologic stress: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2014 Jun:30(5):979-89. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0419-7. Epub 2014 Apr 17     [PubMed PMID: 24737255]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[11]

Hsi DH, Marreddy R, Moshiyakhov M, Luft U. Regadenoson induced acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary thrombosis. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. 2013 Jun:20(3):481-4. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9694-2. Epub 2013 Mar 5     [PubMed PMID: 23460076]


[12]

Shah S, Parra D, Rosenstein RS. Acute myocardial infarction during regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging. Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Jun:33(6):e90-5. doi: 10.1002/phar.1238. Epub 2013 Mar 7     [PubMed PMID: 23471769]


[13]

Al Moudi M, Sun Z, Lenzo N. Diagnostic value of SPECT, PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review. Biomedical imaging and intervention journal. 2011 Apr:7(2):e9. doi: 10.2349/biij.7.2.e9. Epub 2011 Apr 1     [PubMed PMID: 22287989]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[14]

Machecourt J, Longère P, Fagret D, Vanzetto G, Wolf JE, Polidori C, Comet M, Denis B. Prognostic value of thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging according to extent of myocardial defect. Study in 1,926 patients with follow-up at 33 months. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1994 Apr:23(5):1096-106     [PubMed PMID: 8144775]


[15]

Johnson NP, Schimmel DR Jr, Dyer SP, Leonard SM, Holly TA. Survival by stress modality in patients with a normal myocardial perfusion study. The American journal of cardiology. 2011 Apr 1:107(7):986-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.022. Epub 2011 Jan 20     [PubMed PMID: 21256467]