• Sign Up

Nutcracker Syndrome


Nutcracker Syndrome

Article Author:
Dana Penfold
Article Editor:
Saran Lotfollahzadeh
Updated:
7/6/2020 6:15:22 PM
For CME on this topic:
Nutcracker Syndrome CME
PubMed Link:
Nutcracker Syndrome

Introduction

Left renal vein entrapment syndrome, or nutcracker syndrome (NCS), is characterized by extrinsic compression of the left renal vein (LRV) most commonly between the aorta (Ao) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA),[1] although anatomic differences exist.[2] This entrapment syndrome restricts flow through the left renal vein,[1] resulting in venous congestion and a host of symptoms.[3] Nutcracker syndrome describes patients with characteristic symptoms associated with nutcracker anatomical morphology, whereas the nutcracker phenomenon describes the aortomesenteric compression of the LRV while asymptomatic.[1]

Etiology

NCS results from compression of the LRV, associated with embryological LRV development from the aortic collar at 6-8 weeks gestation.[2] Development of the renal veins in utero is critically dependent on the aortic collar, anastomosis of the posterior cardinal veins, subcardinal veins, and supracardinal veins.[4] The LRV is a derivative of the anterior anastomosis, as the posterior portion normally degenerates. Abnormal degeneration of the anterior instead of the posterior part, or posterior regression failure, can lead to a retroaortic LRV or circumaortic LRV, respectively.[4] 

The inferior vena cava (IVC) derives from this anastomosis of fetal veins, forming the final infrarenal, renal, suprarenal, and hepatic segments of the IVC at 8 weeks gestation.[4][5] Rare cases involving abnormal IVC development causing a similar clinical picture have also been described.[5][6][7] The SMA, along with the inferior mesenteric artery and celiac trunk, normally derives from the midline fusion of the 10th, 13th, and 21st pair of the ventral segmental arteries, branches of the paired dorsal aortae.[4] Abnormal angulation of the SMA from the aorta is thought to contribute to the condition.[2][4]

Epidemiology

NCS is considered to be a rare condition, although the exact prevalence is unknown. Cases, including ages from infancy to the seventh decade, have been reported.[8][9] It has been described as occurring more frequently in females in the third to fourth decade, although a later study demonstrated equal prevalence between males and females.[2][9] Prevalence peaks in middle-aged adults and the second to third decade, likely due to the rapid development of the vertebral bodies during puberty, causing angle narrowing between the Ao and SMA.[9] Studies show an earlier diagnosis in males (23.59+/-13.09) than females (29.34+/-13.93).[10]

Pathophysiology

Anterior NCS is the most common type, in which the LRV is compressed between the Ao and SMA. Rarely, posterior NCS occurs and is most commonly a variant involving a retroaortic or circumaortic LRV compressed between the Ao and spinal column.[1][4] Other described variants include LRV duplication, LRV compression between the SMA and right renal artery, LRV compression by dilated left IVC, and right-sided NCS.[4] The venous compression results in outflow obstruction that causes LRV hypertension, which is the underlying mechanism of collateralization and varices.[1][11] Collateralization of venous circulation involves mainly the left gonadal vein and the communicating lumbar vein.[2][12] 

Hematuria occurs when the elevated blood pressure in the collaterals and subsequent venous sinuses near the renal calyces ruptures the thin-walled septum between the small veins and the renal collecting system.[1][4] A lack of renal symptoms may occur in patients with a well-developed collateral circulation that decreases LRV hypertension.[4] Venous congestion proximal to the LRV compression involving the left gonadal vein may cause pelvic congestion syndrome or varicocele.

History and Physical

A study of 112 cases reported a frequency of symptoms including 78.57% for hematuria, 38.39% for left flank pain, 35.71% for varicocele in males, 30.36% for proteinuria, and 13.39% for anemia.[10] Patients may also present with abdominal pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, orthostatic hypotension, fatigue, infertility, varicose veins of the abdomen, vaginal wall, buttocks, or upper thighs.[1][3][1][13] 

Symptoms of autonomic dysfunction may occur, although rare, including hypotension, syncope, and tachycardia.[1][14] Cases of nausea and weight loss, unexplained pelvic pain, and left flank pain with postprandial exacerbation have been described.[14][13][14][3] Physical examination may reveal a left testicular varicocele, vulvar and pelvic varices, or enlarged and tortuous lower extremity varicose veins.

Evaluation

A diagnosis of exclusion of other causes is employed and confirmed with imaging. A stepwise approach includes history and physical examination, doppler ultrasonography (DUS), computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), venography, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).[9] Venography with measurement of renocaval pressure gradient is the gold-standard, although invasive and usually unnecessary for diagnosis.[8] 

Diagnostic imaging criteria include: a renocaval pullback gradient ≥ 3 mmHg, a maximum flow velocity five times increased in the LRV passing the SMA compared to the renal hilum, or an angle less than 45º between the Ao and SMA on CTA or MRA.[8] It should be noted that renocaval pressure gradients ≥ 3 mmHg can be observed in healthy individuals.[9] Additionally, reduced renocaval pressure gradients < 3 mmHg can be seen in patients with NCS and collateralization.[9] Narrowing of the LRV, collateralization, gonadal vein distention, or pelvic congestion may be demonstrated by imaging.[9][13] 

CT has been recommended more recently because of its accuracy and ability to investigate abdominal findings. Of the CT parameters, the most accurate is the "beak sign" and LRV diameter ratio (hilar-aortomesenteric) of ≥4.9.[9][15] IVUS has been shown to have a specificity of 90% compared to 62% with venography.[9] DUS has a sensitivity of 69 to 90% and specificity of 89 to 100% and is most commonly used.[8][11] The decision to use DUS or CT should be based on consideration of individual characteristics, including urgency, radiation exposure, cost and accessibility, contrast allergy, and other abdominal diagnostic possibilities.[8] Urinalysis may reveal orthostatic proteinuria or hematuria that is most often microscopic.[13] Anemia may be observed in patients with prolonged and or significant hematuria.[9][11]

Treatment / Management

There is currently a lack of established treatment guidelines because of limited data. Management is controversial, ranging from conservative treatment to nephrectomy, and depends on symptom severity with interventions typically reserved for those who are symptomatic.[8] De Macedo et al. proposed a treatment algorithm in which conservative treatment is recommended first for patients with mild symptoms and discrete hematuria for 6 months for adults and 24 months for patients under the age of 18 years.[8] 

Prolonged conservative treatment in the pediatric population is highly recommended due to the possibility of spontaneous resolution following adipose tissue development, and multiple venous collateralizations. Medical treatments, including low dose aspirin and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, specifically, alacepril, have been assumed to improve orthostatic proteinuria.[9][11][16] Elastic compression stockings can alleviate pelvic or flank pain.[17][18] Thin patients may benefit from weight gain.[17] 

Endovascular treatment or open surgery is indicated if symptoms persist following conservative treatment, or for those with significant hematuria, severe pain, or renal dysfunction.[8][18] If unsuccessful, open surgery is indicated. If stent complications arise following endovascular treatment, proceed with endovascular repair or repair with open surgery. The point at which treatment or repair is successful and symptoms resolve, regular follow-up should take place.[8]

A review of literature from October 1982 to July 2017 reported 47% of articles described the open surgical approach (most commonly LRV transposition followed by renal autotransplantation), 41.1% described endovascular stenting (EVS), and 11.7% described the minimally invasive extravascular stenting.[19] Although LRV transposition has been the mainstay of treatment formerly, EVS has appeared more recently as a less invasive option, although with insufficient evidence to support it previously.[20] More data is accumulating, which demonstrates the success of EVS, and it is increasingly becoming the preferred approach in centers with both EVS and open surgery experience.[9] Neste first described the use of balloon dilation and endovascular stent placement as a treatment for NCS in 1996.[21] 

Endovascular stenting has been extrapolated from stenting experience that demonstrated good results in the treatment of other venous compression syndromes, including May-Thurner syndrome, and superior vena cava syndrome.[11][22] Balloon expansion can then be used if LRV stenosis remains after stent placement, as recommended by Chen et al., and otherwise avoiding balloon angioplasty.[23] A 2019 retrospective chart review of 18 patients with NCS who underwent LRV stenting (self-expanding stents with a mean diameter of 12.8 +/- 1.6 mm) showed promising results, including 72.2% reported resolved or improved symptoms at an average follow-up of 41.4 +/- 26.6 months.

No perioperative complications occurred. Three out of five patients whose symptoms remained had previously undergone LRV transposition. Stent restenosis or symptom recurrence required stent reintervention in three patients at 5.8 months, 16.8 months, and 51.7 months. No stent migration occurred.[20] Endovascular stenting with stent-assisted coil embolization and complete aneurysm resection have been employed in rare cases of left renal vein aneurysm in the setting of NCS.[24][25]

Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy are recommended during stent endothelialization and include a regimen of 3 days on low molecular weight heparin, 30 days on clopidogrel, and 3 months on aspirin.[8][23] Although, it is unknown whether antiplatelet therapy is beneficial in keeping venous stents patent, as guidelines are very limited because of inadequate studies of venous stents in clinical trials.[26]

Differential Diagnosis

Entrapment of the LRV can be caused by retroperitoneal tumors, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, or pancreatic neoplasm.[21] Further considerations include NCS caused by aortic dissection, coinciding with duodenal obstruction caused by SMA syndrome, or associated with Henoch-Schönlein purpura, IgA nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, and idiopathic hypercalciuria with nephrolithiasis.[27][28][27][1] A patient presenting with flank pain and hematuria should raise suspicion for nephrolithiasis, pyelonephritis, or renal cell carcinoma. A condition involving the thoracolumbar spine or lower ribs may be considered in cases of atypical left flank pain, especially if exacerbated by standing and increased lumbar lordosis.[13]

Prognosis

The natural history of NCS is not entirely clear.[9] It can resolve spontaneously, particularly in children, but may lead to LRV thrombosis and renal injury if left untreated.[9] Gross hematuria can occur, leading to anemia and proteinuria requiring blood transfusion and resulting complications.[9][29] Many young patients outgrow their symptoms after a benign clinical course.[11] Some cases present dramatically and are effectively managed, whereas others have a delayed diagnosis and uncertain treatment.[11]

Complications

Insufficient venous outflow from the left gonadal vein (LGV) can cause dilatation of the LGV walls and rupture, varicocele in men, and pelvic congestion syndrome in women.[8][11] Endovascular embolization may relieve symptoms, although coil displacement into the lung can occur rarely. Moreover, a few other complications, including massive hematuria with unknown reasons, and significant orthostatic proteinuria, were reported.[11] Infertility can result from varicocele or pelvic congestion syndrome. A 2005 review of 5 cases of endovascular stenting reported 1 case of stent migration with uneventful follow-up (mean, 14.3 months) and 2 cases of stent-dislodgement (40-mm-long stents) causing secondary recurrence of symptoms.[22] 

A 2016 retrospective evaluation of 75 patients who underwent endovascular stenting at a single center reported stent migration occurred in 5 patients (6.7%) during a mean 55 months of follow-up. The stent migrated into the left side of the LRV in one patient, IVC in two patients, right atrium in one patient, and right ventricle in one patient. They concluded that preoperative LRV measurements, stent choice, stent deployment, close follow-up, and early detection and treatment are needed to reduce the number of stent migrations, particularly into the heart.[30] Two cases of saccular aneurysm of the LRV occurring in the setting of NCS have been described, which can lead to rupture or thrombus formation and embolization to the venous circulation and pulmonary vasculature.[25][24][31][32]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients should be educated on the complications, particularly renal injury if left untreated. The risk of infertility in those with pelvic congestion syndrome or varicocele should be discussed. Screening is not necessary for family members, as NCS is not a genetic condition.[1]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

A primary care clinician or emergency medical clinician may sometimes be the first to encounter a patient presenting with symptoms of NCS. Considering the differential diagnoses, complications, and different treatment strategies, it is crucial to consult promptly with an interprofessional team of specialists to improve outcomes. This may include an adult or pediatric urologist, nephrologist, obstetrician, gynecologist, interventional cardiologist, interventional radiologist, vascular surgeon, general surgeon, or transplant surgeon. Radiologists are essential to interpreting imaging modalities, including CT or MRI, to determine the cause. Sonographers play an essential role in obtaining doppler ultrasonography images. Nurses serve as vital team members in caring for, monitoring, and educating the patients before and after treatment.

Catheterization laboratory or operating room teams are critical in ensuring safe and effective endovascular or open surgery interventions. Pharmacists are necessary to conservative management involving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and to post-intervention anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, and analgesics when indicated. This collaboration is especially important, as Carroll and Moll note that the potential benefit of keeping venous stents patent with antiplatelets is unknown, and guidelines related to venous stents are currently lacking because of insufficient evidence, rendering the need for clinical trials.[26] 

In recent years, de Macedo et al. and Velasquez et al. have performed systematic reviews and produced treatment approaches. (Level 1)[8][19] Further studies, including large multi-center RCTs and meta-analyses, are still needed to truly elucidate the long-term safety and efficacy of the various treatment modalities discussed and direct the development of management guidelines.


References

[1] Gulleroglu K,Gulleroglu B,Baskin E, Nutcracker syndrome. World journal of nephrology. 2014 Nov 6;     [PubMed PMID: 25374822]
[2] Dunphy L,Penna M,Tam E,El-Kafsi J, Left renal vein entrapment syndrome: nutcracker syndrome! BMJ case reports. 2019 Sep 4;     [PubMed PMID: 31488449]
[3] Maloni KC,Calligaro KD,Lipshutz W,Vani K,Troutman DA,Dougherty MJ, Nutcracker Syndrome as an Unusual Cause of Postprandial Pain. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2020 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 31884879]
[4] Orczyk K,Wysiadecki G,Majos A,Stefańczyk L,Topol M,Polguj M, What Each Clinical Anatomist Has to Know about Left Renal Vein Entrapment Syndrome (Nutcracker Syndrome): A Review of the Most Important Findings. BioMed research international. 2017;     [PubMed PMID: 29376066]
[5] Luo XL,Qian GN,Xiao H,Zhao CL,Zhou XD, Posterior nutcracker syndrome associated with interrupted left inferior vena cava with azygos continuation and retroaortic right renal vein. Korean journal of radiology. 2012 May-Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 22563273]
[6] Fitoz S,Yalcinkaya F, Compression of left inferior vena cava: a form of nutcracker syndrome. Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU. 2008 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 17636501]
[7] Gupta A,Naik N,Gulati GS, Mesoaortic entrapment of a left inferior vena cava. The Indian journal of radiology     [PubMed PMID: 20351998]
[8] de Macedo GL,Dos Santos MA,Sarris AB,Gomes RZ, Diagnosis and treatment of the Nutcracker syndrome: a review of the last 10 years. Jornal vascular brasileiro. 2018 Jul-Sep;     [PubMed PMID: 30643508]
[9] Ananthan K,Onida S,Davies AH, Nutcracker Syndrome: An Update on Current Diagnostic Criteria and Management Guidelines. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2017 Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 28356209]
[10] Orczyk K,Łabetowicz P,Lodziński S,Stefańczyk L,Topol M,Polguj M, The nutcracker syndrome. Morphology and clinical aspects of the important vascular variations: a systematic study of 112 cases. International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology. 2016 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 25972135]
[11] Kurklinsky AK,Rooke TW, Nutcracker phenomenon and nutcracker syndrome. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2010 Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 20511485]
[12] Grimm LJ,Engstrom BI,Nelson RC,Kim CY, Incidental detection of nutcracker phenomenon on multidetector CT in an asymptomatic population: prevalence and associated findings. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2013 May-Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 23674014]
[13] Berthelot JM,Douane F,Maugars Y,Frampas E, Nutcracker syndrome: A rare cause of left flank pain that can also manifest as unexplained pelvic pain. Joint bone spine. 2017 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 27932281]
[14] Daily R,Matteo J,Loper T,Northup M, Nutcracker syndrome: symptoms of syncope and hypotension improved following endovascular stenting. Vascular. 2012 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 22734085]
[15] Kim KW,Cho JY,Kim SH,Yoon JH,Kim DS,Chung JW,Park JH, Diagnostic value of computed tomographic findings of nutcracker syndrome: correlation with renal venography and renocaval pressure gradients. European journal of radiology. 2011 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 20869828]
[16] Ha TS,Lee EJ, ACE inhibition can improve orthostatic proteinuria associated with nutcracker syndrome. Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany). 2006 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 16902785]
[17] Butros SR,Liu R,Oliveira GR,Ganguli S,Kalva S, Venous compression syndromes: clinical features, imaging findings and management. The British journal of radiology. 2013 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 23908347]
[18] Hulsberg PC,McLoney E,Partovi S,Davidson JC,Patel IJ, Minimally invasive treatments for venous compression syndromes. Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy. 2016 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 28123978]
[19] Velasquez CA,Saeyeldin A,Zafar MA,Brownstein AJ,Erben Y, A systematic review on management of nutcracker syndrome. Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders. 2018 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 29292117]
[20] Avgerinos ED,Saadeddin Z,Humar R,Salem K,Singh M,Hager E,Makaroun M,Chaer RA, Outcomes of left renal vein stenting in patients with nutcracker syndrome. Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders. 2019 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 31471277]
[21] Neste MG,Narasimham DL,Belcher KK, Endovascular stent placement as a treatment for renal venous hypertension. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR. 1996 Nov-Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 8951753]
[22] Hartung O,Grisoli D,Boufi M,Marani I,Hakam Z,Barthelemy P,Alimi YS, Endovascular stenting in the treatment of pelvic vein congestion caused by nutcracker syndrome: lessons learned from the first five cases. Journal of vascular surgery. 2005 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 16102626]
[23] Chen S,Zhang H,Shi H,Tian L,Jin W,Li M, Endovascular stenting for treatment of Nutcracker syndrome: report of 61 cases with long-term followup. The Journal of urology. 2011 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 21683388]
[24] Tan AP,Chua BS,Lim KB,Taneja M, Unusual Clinical Presentation of Nutcracker Phenomenon. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2017 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 29355284]
[25] Lazar A,Kniery K,Morrissey N, Left renal vein aneurysm in a young woman with renal nutcracker syndrome. Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques. 2019 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 31799484]
[26] Carroll S,Moll S, Inferior Vena Cava Filters, May-Thurner Syndrome, and Vein Stents. Circulation. 2016 Feb 9;     [PubMed PMID: 26858294]
[27] Kodama K,Noda T,Motoi I, Nutcracker phenomenon: An unusual presentation of acute aortic dissection. Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. 2013 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 23671371]
[28] Inal M,Unal Daphan B,Karadeniz Bilgili MY, Superior mesenteric artery syndrome accompanying with nutcracker syndrome: a case report. Iranian Red Crescent medical journal. 2014 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 25763192]
[29] Oteki T,Nagase S,Hirayama A,Sugimoto H,Hirayama K,Hattori K,Koyama A, Nutcracker syndrome associated with severe anemia and mild proteinuria. Clinical nephrology. 2004 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 15267016]
[30] Wu Z,Zheng X,He Y,Fang X,Li D,Tian L,Zhang H, Stent migration after endovascular stenting in patients with nutcracker syndrome. Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders. 2016 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 26993867]
[31] Rios A,Parsa P,Eidt J,Pearl G, A novel surgical approach to symptomatic left renal vein aneurysm. Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders. 2017 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 29037361]
[32] Özyüksel A,Aktaş S,Çalıs E,Erol C,Sevmiş Ş, Ex Vivo Resection and Renal Autotransplantation for the Treatment of a Large Renal Vein Aneurysm Causing Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism and a Coexisting Vascular Malformation: A Case Report. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2016 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 27334478]