• Sign Up

Bladder Sphincter Dyssynergia


Bladder Sphincter Dyssynergia

Article Author:
Michael Feloney
Article Editor:
Stephen Leslie
Updated:
9/23/2020 12:10:44 PM
For CME on this topic:
Bladder Sphincter Dyssynergia CME
PubMed Link:
Bladder Sphincter Dyssynergia

Introduction

A physiologically compliant detrusor muscle and a competent urethral sphincter are both necessary to maintain urinary function and continence. Normal micturition has a storage phase and a voiding phase. The storage phase consists of a passive filling of the bladder while voiding needs careful coordination between the detrusor contraction and relaxation of both external and internal sphincters. This complex micturition process is under the control of the central nervous system, which coordinates the activity of the autonomic and somatic nervous systems to guarantee normal urinary continence and micturition. Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) is the urodynamic term for variable lower urinary tract symptoms due to detrusor muscle contraction with concomitant and inappropriate involuntary urethral sphincter contraction.[1]

Etiology

Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia is believed to occur due to neurological lesions of the suprasacral spinal cord. The lesions might be due to spinal cord injury (traumatic), myelodysplasia, multiple sclerosis, congenital anomalies like neural tube defects, spina bifida, and spinal dysraphism, stroke, infections of the spinal cord, and transverse myelitis. Of these, spinal cord injuries, spina bifida, and multiple sclerosis are most commonly associated with DSD.

DSD is categorized into 3 types. Type 1 describes the condition where, initially, there is a simultaneous detrusor contraction and sphincter tightening. As the detrusor contraction peaks, the sphincter relaxes suddenly, resulting in urination. In type 2 DSD, the external urethral sphincter contracts sporadically across the entire detrusor contraction. Type 3 DSD is characterized by a crescendo-decrescendo pattern of sphincter contraction that results in obstruction of the urethra throughout the entire detrusor contraction.[2][3] 

This classification has been simplified by Weld et al. (2000) into two types: continuous or intermittent DSD.[4] The type and degree of the spinal cord injury (SCI) lesions seem to correlate with the specific subtype of the corresponding detrusor sphincter dyssynergia. Patients with cervical level lesions are more likely to develop DSD than patients with lesions at lower levels of the spinal cord.[5] Type 1 DSD is associated with patients whose neurological lesions are incomplete. Complete neurological lesions will cause DSD types 2 and 3.

Epidemiology

The exact incidence of DSD is unknown, although it can occur in almost any significant neurological disease. Spinal cord injury constitutes a significant portion of all DSD cases. Spinal cord injuries usually affect younger age groups with a significant male preponderance.[6] Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia is present in 75% of patients with suprasacral spinal cord injuries. About 35% of all patients with multiple sclerosis will demonstrate DSD when urodynamically tested, and up to half of all infants with spina bifida will also have the disorder.[7][8]

Pathophysiology

While in the storage phase, urine is contained in the bladder by the tone of sphincter complexes. The internal urinary sphincter, an elongation of the trigone/detrusor muscle, encircles the neck of the bladder.[9] As the bladder is filling up with urine, sympathetic activation contracts the internal sphincter and closes the bladder neck. The external sphincter, however, is a muscle that is under voluntary control and is situated more distal than the internal sphincter. The external urinary sphincter (EUS) functions under the control of pudendal nerve fibers and is situated in Onuf’s nucleus between S2–S4.

During urine storage, the proximal urethral pressure must exceed the pressure within the bladder to ensure continence. While the bladder is filling, urethral pressure increases progressively through the stimulation of internal and external sphincters via the hypogastric and pudendal nerve, respectively. This is known as “the guarding reflex.” When there is an urge for voiding, inhibition from the midbrain and prefrontal cortex is reduced, and the guarding reflex is suppressed by the pontine micturition center through the spinobulbospinal tracts. There is inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system, a decrease in the stimulation of Onuf’s nucleus and the pudendal nerve, causing relaxation of the external sphincter muscle that results in decreased urethral pressures. Micturition then occurs with the activation of the parasympathetic nervous system (S2–S4). However, in DSD, the detrusor contracts against a closed bladder outlet as there is an involuntary contraction of the urinary sphincter. Pathophysiologically, this probably occurs from disruption of the spinobulbospinal tract between the pontine micturition complex and Onuf’s nucleus resulting in increased urethral closure pressures during detrusor contractions.[1] 

Hydronephrosis and renal deterioration have been associated with sustained, elevated detrusor pressures over 40 cm of water.[10] This represents an elevated detrusor leak point pressure, which is often found in DSD, particularly the continuous type. The potential for progressive kidney damage and renal failure is an important reason to properly diagnose and treat this condition.[11][12]

There may also be an association between DSD and autonomic dysreflexia, but this has been difficult to document as diagnosing these two conditions has not been standardized.[13]

History and Physical

Patients with DSD usually present with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), frequently complaining about problems with voiding and/or storage. Symptoms generally include chronic urinary retention, intermittent voiding, and irregular small volume voiding or incontinence without an associated urge to void (reflex incontinence). Neurological symptoms may be predominant and lead to neurological workup initially. DSD is only likely to be found if there is some neurologic disorder affecting the central nervous system.

The history and physical examination aim are to discover the etiology and pattern of bladder dysfunction, to search for complications, and to evaluate for changes in bowel and bladder habits together with any associated neurological symptoms. Clinicians should screen for unseen neurological disease and investigate unexplained vision problems, back or neck pain, weakness, numbness, dysesthesia, and unexplained urinary or bowel symptoms. An abdominal examination is necessary to look for a palpable bladder, retained fecal matter, tenderness, and evidence of past surgeries. Examine the genitalia for any pathology and skin irritation. A digital rectal examination should be done to assess the anal tone at rest and also during voluntary contraction. Perineal sensation should be noted, and various other perineal reflexes should be noted.[14]

Evaluation

The ultimate aim of an evaluation is to make an accurate diagnosis of the nature of bladder dysfunction and identify the underlying cause as well as any associated complications. The general approach to the diagnosis begins with a basic investigation of lower urinary tract symptoms to rule out common causes. Urine culture and sensitivity should be done if there is a suspicion of UTI. Besides serum electrolytes, urea & creatinine should also be measured. A 24-hour urine voiding diary will help characterize the voiding dysfunction. Ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) scan imaging can be helpful for the assessment of hydronephrosis, reflux, urinary calculi, and post-void residual urine volumes, although they will not specifically help diagnose DSD.

The diagnosis of DSD is made through a urodynamic study with or without fluoroscopy via electromyography (EMG), voiding cystourethrogram, video urodynamics, or urethral pressure profile measurements. Cystoscopy is often recommended to rule out any urethral strictures which might affect these studies.[1] The diagnosis of DSD by electromyography requires finding increased EMG sphincter activity during a detrusor contraction, in the absence of Valsalva or Crede maneuvers. Typical voiding cystourethrogram findings include a closed bladder neck during filling with subsequent dilation of the bladder neck and proximal urethra to the level of the external urinary sphincter during micturition.

DSD may be suggested by the finding of a plateau level of voiding detrusor pressure, but this is not diagnostic by itself without confirmation.[15]

Urethral pressures are used as an adjunctive tool for diagnosing DSD. A 7 French urodynamic catheter, with independent bladder and urethral pressure sensors, is placed with the urethral sensors at the point of maximal sphincter pressure in the proximal urethra. DSD is then defined as an acute urethral pressure rise >20 cm of water during or immediately prior to a voluntary or involuntary detrusor contraction.[1][16]

Treatment / Management

First, clinicians and patients should agree on the primary goals of treatment before initiating therapy. Protecting renal function, improving patient safety, and optimizing the quality of life are the three typical goals that need to be prioritized. In general, the specific goals of initiating treatment for DSD are achieving adequate storage and bladder emptying without high intravesical pressures, preserving the upper urinary tracts, controlling infections, and achieving social acceptability. After treatment is initiated, patients should be followed with frequent clinical assessments and repeat urodynamic studies to evaluate continuing treatment efficacy. Educating the patient and family by providing them with a clear, basic understanding of the anatomy and physiology of the condition can greatly assist in improving outcomes.

Type 1 DSD is usually managed conservatively (watchful waiting), with the exception of those patients complicated by hydronephrosis, renal cortical loss, vesicoureteric reflux, or autonomic dysreflexia. Types 2 and 3 DSD should be treated when diagnosed to avoid complications.

Pharmacotherapy alone has a relatively limited role in the management of DSD.[17] Alpha-blockers such as tamsulosin have shown some activity in reducing post-void residual volumes and increasing voided volumes.[18] Diazepam has also been used alone or together with alpha-blockers, and while there are anecdotal reports of reasonable success, there are no controlled studies to justify its use. Oral baclofen has long been used for skeletal muscle spasticity, but it does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier well and therefore has little effect on DSD unless direct intrathecal delivery is performed. This has been shown to work well for DSD, although there are no long term or randomized trials, and intrathecal delivery is labor-intensive as well as invasive.[19][20][21][22] 

Other pharmacotherapies have also been tried, including nitric oxide donors (glyceryl trinitrate), benzodiazepines, and dantrolene sodium, but none are currently recommended. Intravesical oxybutynin has also been used for DSD. It would theoretically reduce uninhibited contractions while increasing bladder storage capacity. There is currently insufficient clinical data or trials to support its use intravescially, although it appears to a helpful adjunct when taken orally.[23]

Sacral neuromodulation may be very useful in treating DSD, although randomized and long term studies are lacking. It appears able to improve bladder function while lowering average detrusor voiding pressures and avoids the development of detrusor sphincter dyssynergia in some experimental spinal cord injury animal models.[24]

Clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC), combined optimally with antimuscarinics as needed to reduce detrusor contractions and pressures, is the most successful and commonly used treatment for DSD. But this modality might not be suitable for all patients. CISC treatment permits the bladder to be drained and emptied of urine despite the dyssynergic sphincter, while antimuscarinic therapy lowers the detrusor pressure and minimizes contractions.[1] Side effects of antimuscarinics include dry eyes, dry mouth, constipation, nausea, headache, and cognitive effects. Renal ultrasound can be used to track the effectiveness of treatment on reducing hydronephrosis. Indwelling catheters, especially suprapubic tubes, are recommended when patients are unable to do self-catheterization.[25][26]

There are three methods of self-catheterization. "Clean" technique is typically used at home as the other two methods are primarily used in hospitals, nursing homes, and rehab centers during early management. Then, patients are taught the clean technique. No therapy is exempt from complications. When done without proper care, attention, and manual dexterity, self-catheterization carries the risk of a urethral injury as well as the always present risk of infection.

When conservative treatments fail, botulinum toxin injections to the urethra or bladder appears to be a reasonable primary treatment strategy. Botulinum toxin cleaves synaptosomal-associated proteins, which normally move these vesicles to the presynaptic membrane resulting in inhibition of acetylcholine release. Botulinum toxin administration causes flaccid paralysis of the affected muscle. When injected directly into the sphincter muscle, either cystoscopically or via transperineal ultrasonography, the treatment appears to be effective with a reported duration from 2 to 13 months.[27][28][29] The technique involves 2 to 4 injections on the dorsal portion of the sphincter between the 9, 12, and 3 o'clock positions using a total of 100 units of botulinum toxin A.[30] Although the toxin may take 24 to 48 hours to exert its effects, it's binding to the presynaptic membrane is irreversible, and it produces a longlasting paralysis.[30][31]

Historically, external sphincterotomy (therapeutic destruction of the external sphincter at the 12 o'clock position) was the standard treatment, but this may be associated with significant complications such as uncontrollable incontinence, recurrent infections and epididymitis, stones, urethral diverticula, bladder neck stenosis, strictures, hemorrhage, erectile dysfunction, persistent hydronephrosis, and recurrent epididymitis. Minimally invasive techniques such as balloon dilatation and urethral stents (temporary and permanent) seem to be safe and efficacious, but long-term data are lacking. One obvious advantage of the urethral stent is potential reversibility, but it can migrate or cause bladder neck obstruction.[32][33]

Differential Diagnosis

Since DSD patients present with symptoms of lower urinary tract symptoms, more common causes need to be investigated before diagnosing DSD. More common etiologies of these symptoms include non-neurogenic causes like bladder neck obstruction, external sphincter spasticity, bladder neck, and urethral strictures, dysfunctional voiding, and pseudodyssynergia. Pseudodyssynergia is the presence of an external urethral sphincter contraction occurring during micturition that may be easily misinterpreted as DSD. Causes of pseudodyssynergia include abdominal straining with Valsalva, pain response, or attempting to block a detrusor contraction.[11]

Prognosis

Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia results in high bladder pressure leading to renal reflux effects, bladder damage, and various types of dysfunctional voiding. Up to 50% of patients with DSD suffer complications if no intervention is done. A metanalysis revealed varying success rates for different treatment modalities: botulinum A injections into the external sphincter (reported success rates = 64% to 100%) or bladder (44% to 76%), urethral stents (9% to 91%), sphincterotomy (48% to 85%), transurethral incision of the bladder neck (82%), pharmacologic therapy (44% to 76%), and sacral neuromodulation (60%).

Complications

Up to 50% of patients with untreated detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) can develop serious urologic complications, which are much less common in females because of the lower detrusor pressures generated compared to men with DSD. If left untreated, DSD can result in urinary tract infection/urosepsis, vesicoureteric reflux, hydronephrosis, upper urinary tract deterioration, renal insufficiency, urolithiasis, and bladder damage. In addition, patients may also suffer complications from the treatment received.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Since patients have symptoms of the lower urinary tract, which might affect social adaptability, proper education about the disease course and condition with patient-centered treatment modalities helps patients refrain from such social problems.

Pearls and Other Issues

It is not unreasonable to try oral medications, such as alpha-blockers like tamsulosin, along with diazepam if the symptoms and intensity of the DSD are not too severe.

Sacral neuromodulation may be an effective early therapy even if still mostly unproven. Consider it if the technology is available. 

Sphincterotomy protects the bladder and kidneys, but the resulting incontinence is severe and irreversible.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

It might be quite difficult for clinicians to diagnose DSD since the disease presentation mimics a myriad of other conditions. A high index of clinical suspicion with the relevant investigation is the key to diagnosis. Involving nurses, physiotherapists, pharmacists, and patients themselves is crucial for a holistic management approach. When possible, patients should be encouraged to perform clean intermittent self-catheterization, which requires them to have sufficient motivation and dedication as well as adequate manual dexterity, cognitive function, compatible body size and shape, and a psychological acceptation of the technique. If the patient is treated at home, community nurses and social workers should be involved to monitor patients and make referrals when needed.


References

[1] Stoffel JT, Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia: a review of physiology, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. Translational andrology and urology. 2016 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 26904418]
[2] Chancellor MB,Kaplan SA,Blaivas JG, Detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia. Ciba Foundation symposium. 1990;     [PubMed PMID: 2226060]
[3] Castro-Diaz D,Taracena Lafuente JM, Detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. International journal of clinical practice. Supplement. 2006 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 17169006]
[4] Weld KJ,Graney MJ,Dmochowski RR, Clinical significance of detrusor sphincter dyssynergia type in patients with post-traumatic spinal cord injury. Urology. 2000 Oct 1;     [PubMed PMID: 11018603]
[5] Araki I,Matsui M,Ozawa K,Takeda M,Kuno S, Relationship of bladder dysfunction to lesion site in multiple sclerosis. The Journal of urology. 2003 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 12629367]
[6] Hamid R,Averbeck MA,Chiang H,Garcia A,Al Mousa RT,Oh SJ,Patel A,Plata M,Del Popolo G, Epidemiology and pathophysiology of neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury. World journal of urology. 2018 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 29752515]
[7] Al Dandan HB,Coote S,McClurg D, Prevalence of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. International journal of MS care. 2020 Mar-Apr     [PubMed PMID: 32410904]
[8] Bauer SB,Hallett M,Khoshbin S,Lebowitz RL,Winston KR,Gibson S,Colodny AH,Retik AB, Predictive value of urodynamic evaluation in newborns with myelodysplasia. JAMA. 1984 Aug 3     [PubMed PMID: 6737668]
[9] Ashton-Miller JA,DeLancey JO, Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2007 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 17416924]
[10] McGuire EJ,Woodside JR,Borden TA,Weiss RM, Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. The Journal of urology. 1981 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 7196460]
[11] Bacsu CD,Chan L,Tse V, Diagnosing detrusor sphincter dyssynergia in the neurological patient. BJU international. 2012 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 22458490]
[12] Killorin W,Gray M,Bennett JK,Green BG, The value of urodynamics and bladder management in predicting upper urinary tract complications in male spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia. 1992 Jun     [PubMed PMID: 1635794]
[13] Liu N,Zhou M,Biering-Sørensen F,Krassioukov AV, Iatrogenic urological triggers of autonomic dysreflexia: a systematic review. Spinal cord. 2015 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 25800696]
[14] Stöhrer M,Goepel M,Kondo A,Kramer G,Madersbacher H,Millard R,Rossier A,Wyndaele JJ, The standardization of terminology in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: with suggestions for diagnostic procedures. International Continence Society Standardization Committee. Neurourology and urodynamics. 1999;     [PubMed PMID: 10081953]
[15] Agarwal MM,Jain S,Mavuduru R,Singh SK,Mandal AK, Plateau pattern of detrusor contraction: A surrogate indicator of presence of external sphincter dysfunction during micturitional phase of urodynamic study. Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. 2016 Apr-Jun     [PubMed PMID: 27127357]
[16] Blaivas JG,Sinha HP,Zayed AA,Labib KB, Detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia. The Journal of urology. 1981 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 7218456]
[17] Ahmed HU,Shergill IS,Arya M,Shah PJ, Management of detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia. Nature clinical practice. Urology. 2006 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 16835625]
[18] Stankovich EIu,Borisov VV,Demina TL, [Tamsulosin in the treatment of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia of the urinary bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis]. Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999). 2004 Jul-Aug     [PubMed PMID: 15457955]
[19] Blok BF,Holstege G, Ultrastructural evidence for a direct pathway from the pontine micturition center to the parasympathetic preganglionic motoneurons of the bladder of the cat. Neuroscience letters. 1997 Feb 7     [PubMed PMID: 9148248]
[20] Leyson JF,Martin BF,Sporer A, Baclofen in the treatment of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia in spinal cord injury patients. The Journal of urology. 1980 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 7411729]
[21] Meythaler JM,Steers WD,Tuel SM,Cross LL,Haworth CS, Continuous intrathecal baclofen in spinal cord spasticity. A prospective study. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 1992 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 1466869]
[22] Bushman W,Steers WD,Meythaler JM, Voiding dysfunction in patients with spastic paraplegia: urodynamic evaluation and response to continuous intrathecal baclofen. Neurourology and urodynamics. 1993     [PubMed PMID: 7920673]
[23] Humblet M,Verpoorten C,Christiaens MH,Hirche H,Jansen K,Buyse G,van Gool JD, Long-term outcome of intravesical oxybutynin in children with detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia: with special reference to age-dependent parameters. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2015 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 24436114]
[24] Keller EE,Patras I,Hutu I,Roider K,Sievert KD,Aigner L,Janetschek G,Lusuardi L,Zimmermann R,Bauer S, Early sacral neuromodulation ameliorates urinary bladder function and structure in complete spinal cord injury minipigs. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2020 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 31868966]
[25] Feifer A,Corcos J, Contemporary role of suprapubic cystostomy in treatment of neuropathic bladder dysfunction in spinal cord injured patients. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2008     [PubMed PMID: 18551568]
[26] Stoffel JT,McGuire EJ, Outcome of urethral closure in patients with neurologic impairment and complete urethral destruction. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2006     [PubMed PMID: 16173042]
[27] Dykstra DD,Sidi AA,Scott AB,Pagel JM,Goldish GD, Effects of botulinum A toxin on detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia in spinal cord injury patients. The Journal of urology. 1988 May     [PubMed PMID: 3361663]
[28] Gallien P,Reymann JM,Amarenco G,Nicolas B,de Sèze M,Bellissant E, Placebo controlled, randomised, double blind study of the effects of botulinum A toxin on detrusor sphincter dyssynergia in multiple sclerosis patients. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2005 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 16291892]
[29] Kuo HC, Therapeutic outcome and quality of life between urethral and detrusor botulinum toxin treatment for patients with spinal cord lesions and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia. International journal of clinical practice. 2013 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 24073977]
[30] Mahfouz W,Corcos J, Management of detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia in neurogenic bladder. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2011 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 22081065]
[31] Schurch B,Hodler J,Rodic B, Botulinum A toxin as a treatment of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia in patients with spinal cord injury: MRI controlled transperineal injections. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 1997 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 9343126]
[32] Wilson TS,Lemack GE,Dmochowski RR, UroLume stents: lessons learned. The Journal of urology. 2002 Jun     [PubMed PMID: 11992061]
[33] Abdul-Rahman A,Ismail S,Hamid R,Shah J, A 20-year follow-up of the mesh wallstent in the treatment of detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia in patients with spinal cord injury. BJU international. 2010 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 20500511]