• Sign Up

Biliary Duct Hamartoma


Biliary Duct Hamartoma

Article Author:
Haley Lanser
Article Editor:
Yana Puckett
Updated:
5/14/2020 10:28:57 AM
For CME on this topic:
Biliary Duct Hamartoma CME
PubMed Link:
Biliary Duct Hamartoma

Introduction

Multiple biliary duct hamartomas or “von Meyenburg complexes” are rare, benign liver malformations characterized by cystic dilated biliary ducts that were first discovered in 1918 by Von Meyenburg. They are usually incidentally found at autopsy or laparotomy due to the asymptomatic clinical course.[1][2][3][4] They are usually diagnosed on imaging as single or multiple small cystic nodules ranging from 0.05 to 1.5 cm in size. Although incidental findings, they can mimic liver metastatic disease as well as other clinically significant diseases. Thus, proper diagnosis with specific imaging findings or confirmation with histological evaluation is required.[5][6]

Etiology

Biliary duct hamartomas, otherwise known as Von Meyenburg complexes, are dilated cystic bile ducts, which are embryologic remnants that failed to involute during the period of embryogenesis. They are typically small (<5mm) and present as multiple lesions scattered throughout the liver. They are rare, asymptomatic, and with a relatively benign disease course. They are most commonly found during laparotomy for another procedure, on imaging, or at autopsy.   Etiology is unknown, however, it is thought that biliary duct hamartomas develop from the smaller embryonic interlobular bile ducts, which fail to involute.[7] Several studies have found an increased frequency in cirrhotic livers due to chronic viral hepatitis or alcohol liver disease or secondary to inflammation or ischemia, which may demonstrate that these lesions can be acquired.[2][4] In addition, biliary duct hamartomas are more common in patients with polycystic liver disease or patients with congenital hepatic fibrosis.[2]

Epidemiology

The prevalence of multiple biliary duct hamartomas ranges from 0.6 to 5.6% in adults seen at autopsy and 0.35% in needle biopsy of liver lesion for diagnosis.[3][4][8] Prevalence in children is 0.9%.[9] Most patients are greater than 35 years old, and females are affected three times more than males.[4] Approximately 5% of the population have bile duct hamartomas based on one autopsy study.[10]

Pathophysiology

Bile duct hamartomas are thought to arise from abnormal development of intrahepatic bile ducts. Histologically, they are composed of inflammatory cells, bile ducts, and fibrosis. No BRAF V600E mutations have yet been identified in biliary hamartomas despite bile duct adenomas having that mutation.[11]

Histopathology

Macroscopically, biliary duct hamartomas appear as multiple small grey-white nodules scattered throughout both liver lobes within the subcapsular and periportal areas. These lesions typically do not communicate with the biliary tree, although they can.[3][7] Microscopically, they are composed of a collection of dilated branching cystic bile ducts lined with a single layer of cuboid epithelial cells surrounded by an abundant fibro-collagenous stroma. The lesions measure about 0.1 to 1.5 cm each. The bile duct lumens typically contain bile-stained granular material.[2][3][8] They are thought to arise from congenital bile duct remnants that have failed to involute.[3]

History and Physical

Typically, patients are clinically asymptomatic with an unremarkable physical exam as the diagnosis is usually incidental on laparotomy for another procedure. Rarely, patients can present with fevers, jaundice, abdominal distension, and right upper quadrant or epigastric pain.[3][8][9]

Evaluation

As a result of the incidental and usually benign nature of multiple biliary duct hamartomas, no evaluation is necessary for the diagnosis. However, while most patients will have normal lab results, some can present with mild elevations in liver function tests, specifically aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT). Typically these lesions are found initially on ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) done for a different reason. On ultrasound, these lesions appear as multiple hyper and hypoechoic areas within the liver with comet-tail artifacts. On CT, they appear as multiple, nodular, irregular cystic liver lesions with low attenuation and no enhancement with intravenous contrast injection. The most sensitive imaging modality is magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP), which shows multiple T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense diffuse cystic liver lesions of variable sizes 0.1 to 1.5 cm which do not communicate with the biliary tree and do not enhance with intravenous gadolinium injection.[8][9][12] The most specific finding on MRCP for biliary duct hamartomas is mural nodules, which are endocytic polypoid projections due to conjunctive septa that are isointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. The presence of mural nodules can help diagnose multiple biliary duct hamartomas with accuracy and help avoid misdiagnosis.[13]

Treatment / Management

Aside from the possible risk of malignant transformation, multiple biliary duct hamartomas is a benign, otherwise asymptomatic condition with no long-term adverse outcomes and no treatment is required.[9] However, suspicious lesions should be followed regularly with repeat imaging and possible liver biopsy for definitive diagnosis. Any changes of the lesion on repeat imaging or any elevations from tumor markers from baseline should warrant further workup with possible surgical resection when the diagnosis is definitive, and the lesion is operable.[4][9]

Differential Diagnosis

The diagnosis of multiple biliary duct hamartomas is usually incidental at autopsy or on radiographic imaging. However, when discovered on imaging, it is important to determine a correct diagnosis due to its close resemblance to metastatic disease of the liver, especially in a patient with extra-hepatic malignant tumors. Typically, liver metastases are ill-defined with variable sizes on plain computed tomography (CT) imaging with varying degrees of enhancement with IV contrast.[3] Bile duct hamartomas, on the contrary, typically do not enhance with IV contrast on CT imaging, are usually uniform, and measure 1 to 15 mm in size.[2]

Other differential diagnoses include bile duct adenomas, peribiliary cysts, microabscesses of the liver, intrahepatic biliary stones, and Caroli’s disease. Bile duct adenomas have small round tubules with small inconspicuous lumens while bile duct hamartomas have dilated lumens with inspissated bile.[2] Peribiliary cysts are located specifically within the hepatic hilum within connective tissue along the portal vein, do not communicate with the biliary tree, and typically enlarge and compress the biliary tree over time, which is contrasted to the diffuse scattered nature of biliary duct hamartomas.[3][3][7] Microabscesses of the liver are usually present as multiple round loculated hypodense lesions on CT. They are seen in patients with immunosuppression, fever, and epigastric pain, which can be differentiated from bile duct hamartomas by signs of sepsis, which are not typically seen in the latter.[3] Caroli’s disease is characterized by intrahepatic bile duct dilation communicating with the biliary tree, differentiated from bile duct hamartomas with MRCP by contrast enhancement with intravenous gadolinium.[3][12]

Surgical Oncology

The clinical problem posed by this benign tumor is for the surgeon or surgical oncologist who encounters such a lesion during a laparotomy for another malignant lesion. Typically, the surgeon will perform a liver biopsy for frozen section once this lesion is encountered. It can be difficult to distinguish benign hamartomas from metastatic disease in the liver. The pathologist who receives the specimen for frozen section, who is unaware of this entity, may label the lesion as metastatic carcinoma or Carolis' disease. However, these lesions do not communicate with bile ducts, and no treatment is necessary.

Prognosis

Due to the asymptomatic clinical course in most and incidental findings at autopsy for patients who die of unrelated diseases, the prognosis is typically great. However, patients who have malignant transformation typically have a very poor 5-year survival rate of 15 to 40%.[14]

Complications

There are small subsets of patients who experience a malignant transformation of multiple biliary duct hamartomas to either intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (more common) or hepatocellular carcinoma. Risk factors for possible malignant transformation include long-term tobacco use, large biliary duct hamartomas (> 2 cm), and bile stasis.[15] It is important to have periodic long-term follow-up with these patients with a definitive diagnosis of multiple biliary duct hamartomas. Patients require a baseline CA 19-9 level, which can be slightly elevated with multiple biliary duct hamartomas. Any changes to MRI/MRCP imaging in addition to elevations in tumor markers warrants further evaluation with liver lesion biopsy and possible resection of lesions if operable with a definitive diagnosis.[9]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Educational materials for the patient as well as clinicians should include: 

  • Full understanding of the wide differential diagnoses for multiple biliary duct hamartomas 
  • Specific findings on ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging 
  • importance of long-term follow-up for these patients due to possible malignant transformation to help prevent adverse outcomes

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Patients with multiple biliary duct hamartoma typically require no extensive workup. However, it is important that radiologists understand this disease and its appearance on imaging to help differentiate it from more malignant or life-threatening liver lesions. Surgeons and oncologists must be aware of this disease in the case of malignant transformation requiring liver resection and chemotherapy or radiation for treatment. Good communication and education with the pathologist and surgeon are paramount to deal with benign liver lesions.



(Click Image to Enlarge)
Figure 1. 37-year old female diagnosed as gallstones with acute cholecystitis. The incidental findings ; a: US image show multiple hypoechoic lesions, some of them with comet-tail artifacts, raises the possibility of multiple biliary hamartoma; b: T2-weighted MR image show numerous cystic lesions with signal similar to CSF; c: Post contrast T2 weighted MR image shows some of these lesions with enhancing mural nodule, highly specific for biliary hamartoma; d: MRCP 3D projection image more lesions and demonstrate no communication with normal caliber biliary duct.
Figure 1. 37-year old female diagnosed as gallstones with acute cholecystitis. The incidental findings ; a: US image show multiple hypoechoic lesions, some of them with comet-tail artifacts, raises the possibility of multiple biliary hamartoma; b: T2-weighted MR image show numerous cystic lesions with signal similar to CSF; c: Post contrast T2 weighted MR image shows some of these lesions with enhancing mural nodule, highly specific for biliary hamartoma; d: MRCP 3D projection image more lesions and demonstrate no communication with normal caliber biliary duct.
Contributed by Amir Borhani, MD

References

[1] Sugawara T,Shindoh J,Hoshi D,Hashimoto M, Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and portal hypertension developing in a patient with multicystic biliary microhamartomas. The Malaysian journal of pathology. 2018 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 30580365]
[2] Torbenson MS, Hamartomas and malformations of the liver. Seminars in diagnostic pathology. 2019 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 30579648]
[3] Zheng RQ,Zhang B,Kudo M,Onda H,Inoue T, Imaging findings of biliary hamartomas. World journal of gastroenterology. 2005 Oct 28;     [PubMed PMID: 16419165]
[4] Lin S,Weng Z,Xu J,Wang MF,Zhu YY,Jiang JJ, A study of multiple biliary hamartomas based on 1697 liver biopsies. European journal of gastroenterology     [PubMed PMID: 23510964]
[5] Barboi OB,Moisii LG,Albu-Soda A,Ciortescu I,Drug V, Biliary Hamartoma. Clujul medical (1957). 2013;     [PubMed PMID: 26527984]
[6] Guo Y,Jain D,Weinreb J, Von Meyenburg Complex: Current Concepts and Imaging Misconceptions. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2019 Nov/Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 31356525]
[7] Pech L,Favelier S,Falcoz MT,Loffroy R,Krause D,Cercueil JP, Imaging of Von Meyenburg complexes. Diagnostic and interventional imaging. 2016 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 26522945]
[8] Jáquez-Quintana JO,Reyes-Cabello EA,Bosques-Padilla FJ, Multiple Biliary Hamartomas, The ''Von Meyenburg Complexes''. Annals of hepatology. 2017 Sep-Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 28809728]
[9] Yang XY,Zhang HB,Wu B,Li AJ,Fu XH, Surgery is the preferred treatment for bile duct hamartomas. Molecular and clinical oncology. 2017 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 28855998]
[10] Redston MS,Wanless IR, The hepatic von Meyenburg complex: prevalence and association with hepatic and renal cysts among 2843 autopsies [corrected]. Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. 1996 Mar     [PubMed PMID: 8685220]
[11] Pujals A,Bioulac-Sage P,Castain C,Charpy C,Zafrani ES,Calderaro J, BRAF V600E mutational status in bile duct adenomas and hamartomas. Histopathology. 2015 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 25704541]
[12] Sinakos E,Papalavrentios L,Chourmouzi D,Dimopoulou D,Drevelegas A,Akriviadis E, The clinical presentation of Von Meyenburg complexes. Hippokratia. 2011 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 22110302]
[13] Tohmé-Noun C,Cazals D,Noun R,Menassa L,Valla D,Vilgrain V, Multiple biliary hamartomas: magnetic resonance features with histopathologic correlation. European radiology. 2008 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 17934738]
[14] Lee AJ,Chun YS, Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the AJCC/UICC 8th edition updates. Chinese clinical oncology. 2018 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 30180751]
[15] Song JS,Lee YJ,Kim KW,Huh J,Jang SJ,Yu E, Cholangiocarcinoma arising in von Meyenburg complexes: report of four cases. Pathology international. 2008 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 18705771]